I watched my friend open an envelope and listened to her read the first few pages. “I don’t even like her,” she said about the main character. “I don’t care what happens to her.”
Oh. Hmm. Yeah, the reader should probably like the person they’re reading about, right? Or, at least, care about what happens to them next.
Interesting. I hadn’t ever thought about that before. (Yeah, I’m slow.)
Sure, the story hadn’t pulled me in. And I definitely wasn’t sad when she stopped reading. But I wouldn’t have been able to tell you why that was.
Read, read, read! Read published novels, read your writing friends’ manuscripts, read scenes and pages and chapters of anyone and everybody who asks for new eyes to read them.
And then….form opinions!
I’d only critiqued picture book manuscripts and poetry. I didn’t know a thing about writing novels. Sure, I read a lot of books, but I hadn’t taken the time to notice how the author did it. I just enjoyed the story.
But over the year as I read loads of manuscripts written by friends and members of critique groups and workshop attendees, I learned. I learned what seemed to work and what didn’t. Experience takes time. Be patient with yourself.
#2: You need trust.
(This is one I still struggle with.)
Trust yourself! If you’ve read a lot and written a lot then you probably have a good idea of what works and what doesn’t.
When you critique a manuscript you might hear a little voice every now and then say, “Something seems off.” Or maybe you’ll get a weird nudge or, who knows, an electric jolt in your elbow. There are so many times I hear that voice telling me something is just not working in a manuscript, but I ignore it, thinking it’s just me that has a problem with it. But then I’ll meet up with my critique group and someone else brings it up. And I always think, I should’ve listened to that voice. (Sometimes this voice also tells me things about my own writing that I ignore. Luckily, my critique group says it again. And I usually pay attention the second time.)
You are the reader. If something seems strange (and not in a good way), doesn’t fit or doesn’t make sense, make a note of it.
#3: You need the knowledge that you are NOT the writer.
At least, you’re not the writer of the manuscript you’re critiquing.
Now this is a tricky one to remember.
Sometimes when we critique someone else’s words we find problems we want to fix for them. We want to tell them what we think should happen next or suggest how to up the tension or point them in the direction of where we think they should find the love interest (ok. I’m totally guilty of that one. Right, Rosalyn?)
But that’s not your job when critiquing. You don’t need to tell them how to fix their words or their story or their characters. Your job is to tell them what you think does work and what you think doesn’t work. That’s it. It’s their job to then take your input, choose what they want to use, and make their story better.
Now maybe the writer will ask for suggestions or want help brainstorming and that is, of course, a completely different kettle of fish.
#4: You need positive words.
I’ve been in critique groups where people have burst into tears and bolted from the room. Sometimes I’ve been the one who’s given an overzealous critique and then realized later I was much too harsh. And I’ve also been on the receiving end of critiques where I am left feeling as if I’m the absolute worst writer in the whole entire known and unknown universe. (This also includes all alternate universes, realities and dimensions.)
Don’t forget to tell the writer what’s working in their manuscript. Yes, you need to keep your critiques real. False praise isn’t going to help anyone improve. But, if you can, find the good. Where are their strengths? do Do they excell at world building? Is their magic system unique? Do you love the concept of the manuscript? How’s their dialogue? Maybe…eh…they’re really good at punctuation? Find something!
I’ve been in groups where each critique starts with people sharing a few things they liked about the manuscript. What a great way to support each other!
Now I have to say, I’ve never intended to be unkind when critiquing. And I would venture to say others don’t either. But I think we often get so wrapped up in finding the problems with the story that we forget to shine a spotlight on what the writer did right.
Mother Teresa said, “Kind words can be easy to speak. But their echoes are truly endless.”
It’s never a bad thing to have kind words echoing around in your noggin’. Especially when you’re up late at night trying to make a scene work, right?
#5: You need time.
Critiquing someone else’s words is an effort. It requires you to read and then often reread. And maybe even read it again. You have to think about their characters and world and plot arcs and language and…yeah, it’s a lot.
But if you want to be good at critiquing then do it right. Put the same amount of effort and time into critiquing others’ manuscripts as you would want others to put into critiquing your manuscripts. (This is called The Critiquing Golden Rule. Yep. It’s totally a thing. At least…it is now.)
What do you think it takes to be awesome at critiquing?
Erin Shakespear writes middle grade fantasy full of quirky creatures, magic, and strange adventures. With six kids, her days are full of quirky creatures, magic, strange adventures, and…loads of diapers. She also likes to dabble at photography, sewing, jewelry-making, and pretending she’s a grand artist. She is the southern Utah coordinator for the Society of Children’s Book Writers and Illustrators.